Thursday, February 26, 2009

So that Stimulus Package..

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 changed the way COBRA
benefits are administered. Most importantly for employers 65% of COBRA
benefits must be paid for by the employer and then deducted by the
employer from the payroll taxes paid to the government. Most employers
offering health insurance to their employees in the U.S. will be
required to comply with the new COBRA provisions by March 1, 2009.

The new COBRA system provides employees laid-off since September 1, 2008
through the end of 2009 with as much as a nine-month subsidy to help
them continue receiving their employer's health benefits. These former
employees need only pay 35% of the cost of the monthly premium for
health care coverage if their gross income is less than $125,000 for
individuals or $250,000 for couples. The new government subsidy now
covers the remaining 65 % of the cost of the premium. (Different rules
apply for those making more income).

This benefit must be made available to all qualifying individuals.
Employers must send notices to eligible employees notifying them of
their rights to elect COBRA under the new subsidy rules. The
notification must include employees who have already declined COBRA
continuity. Employers must also allow workers to switch to lower-cost
health plans if they are available.

While employers are readying administrative systems to comply if an
employee pays the full amount of the premium, the employee can later use
that overpayment as a credit toward future premiums or the employer can
reimburse the employees the amount of the overpayment.

Jeanelle Lust

jlust@knudsenlaw.com

www.knudsenlaw.com

Jeanelle R. Lust


Preparing a Way Forward

Managing Partner

Office: 402-475-7011

Fax: 402-475-8912

Mobile: 402-440-3731

jlust@knudsenlaw.com <mailto:jlust@knudsenlaw.com>

Knudsen, Berkheimer, Richardson & Endacott, LLP
3800 VerMaas Place, Suite 200

Lincoln, NE 68502

http://www.knudsenlaw.com <http://www.knudsenlaw.com/>

Ms. Lust is a charter fellow in the Litigation Counsel of America
http://www.trialcounsel.org <http://www.trialcounsel.org/> and is
admitted in Colorado, Nebraska and South Dakota. Circular 230
Disclosure: Pursuant to recently-enacted U.S. Treasury Dept Regulations,
we are now required to advise you that, unless otherwise expressly
indicated, any federal tax advice contained in this communication,
including attachments and enclosures, is not intended or written to be
used, and may not be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related
penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing
or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed
herein. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message contains
information from the law firm of Knudsen, Berkheimer, Richardson &
Endacott, LLP which may be confidential or privileged. DO NOT FORWARD
THIS E-MAIL WITHOUT ASSURING PROTECTION OF PRIVILEGED MATERIAL. If you
have questions about forwarding this message, contact us first. All
clients are advised that communication by e-mail may not be secure and
may be subject to interception. This electronic message is intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are
not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If
you have received this electronic transmission in error, please delete
it from all computers and notify us by telephone (402-475-7011) or by
electronic mail immediately.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Knudsen Law Firm Successfully challenges LB 701

The Nebraska Supreme Court ruled on Friday February 6, 2009 that property tax authority given to the Upper, Middle and Lower Republican Natural Resources Districts is unconstitutional because the money is for a state purpose: the Republican River Compact compliance. The Court stated,"We conclude that LB701(1)(d) violates the prohibition against levying a property tax for state purposes ... and that such provision is therefore unconstitutional.” “The state has acknowledged that compliance with the compact is the state’s responsibility by entering into the final settlement stipulation resolving the litigation which was initiated by the state of Kansas in 1998,” the ruling continued. Therefore, the judges concluded, the state is obligated to comply with the compact, and the LB701 tax was designed to meet a state obligation.

LeRoy Sievers of the Knudsen Law Firm said the Supreme Court decision shows that “the taxing provisions were . . . imposing a tax for a state purpose.” Sievers added that the lawsuit was not filed to cause problems in the Republican Basin but to do just the opposite-- have the state do its job in compact compliance. Jeanelle Lust with the firm added the court's message to state senators and water managers is "you can't stick your head in the sand and do nothing about the Republican River issues. Maybe this is what some state senators who don't live in the basin needed to hear."

Lust said Nebraska's water issues won't disappear. The same water shortage issues are cropping up all over the state, and Nebraska needs to find a sensible way of regulating these issues as a state. "What we were really hoping to accomplish, in addition to eliminating the property tax, was to get the Legislature to realize that they can't solve the state's compliance problems on the backs of the people in the Republican River basin," she said. Rod Confer, who tried the case at district court level, and wrote the winning argument on appeal, agreed, "Maybe now the state will come up with some sensible regulations."

In the District Court, Judge Merritt had decided that LB701 created a closed class of NRDs entitled to the law’s taxing authority, making the tax special legislation, and unconstitutional under Nebraska's Constitution. The Supreme Court did not address that argument because “once you’ve found something invalid on one basis, you don’t need to go on to the other (bases).” Sievers said.

Angus Garey of McCook, one of nine Republican River basin landowners and residents who filed the lawsuit, said he was pleased with the decision and expected county commissioners to begin asking NRDs to refund the special property tax revenue to the counties. "The taxpayers of southwest Nebraska are relieved," Garey said.

Rodney M. Confer

Jeanelle R. Lust

LeRoy Sievers

The Knudsen Law Firm

Knudsen, Berkheimer, Richardson & Endacott.

3800 VerMaas Place, Suite 200

Lincoln NE 68512

800 714 3439

jlust@knudsenlaw.com

rconfer@knudsenlaw.com

lsievers@knudsenlaw.com

www.knudsenlaw.com