Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Red Flags Rule update

The Red Flags Rule could be held to not apply to the health care setting
based on a federal court ruling exempting attorneys.

http://www.mcknights.com/advocates-urge-ftc-to-exempt-healthcare-from-re
d-flags-rule-following-federal-court-decision/article/163019/?utm_source
=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+McKnights+%28McKnights+
Home%29&utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher

<http://www.knudsenlaw.com/Att_Bio_JRL.htm>
<http://www.knudsenlaw.com/>

Jeanelle R. Lust

Knudsen, Berkheimer, Richardson & Endacott, LLP

3800 VerMaas Pl

Suite 200

Lincoln NE 68502

402 475 7011

402 423 4768 (H)

402 440 3731 (M)

402 475 8912 (F)

www.knudsenlaw.com

jlust@knudsenlaw.com

Managing Partner

Ms. Lust is a charter fellow in the Litigation Counsel of America
http://www.trialcounsel.org <http://www.trialcounsel.org/> and is
admitted in Colorado, Nebraska and South Dakota. Circular 230
Disclosure: Pursuant to recently-enacted U.S. Treasury Dept Regulations,
we are now required to advise you that, unless otherwise expressly
indicated, any federal tax advice contained in this communication,
including attachments and enclosures, is not intended or written to be
used, and may not be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related
penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing
or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed
herein. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message contains
information from the law firm of Knudsen, Berkheimer, Richardson &
Endacott, LLP which may be confidential or privileged. DO NOT FORWARD
THIS E-MAIL WITHOUT ASSURING PROTECTION OF PRIVILEGED MATERIAL. If you
have questions about forwarding this message, contact us first. All
clients are advised that communication by e-mail may not be secure and
may be subject to interception. This electronic message is intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are
not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If
you have received this electronic transmission in error, please delete
it from all computers and notify us by telephone (402-475-7011) or by
electronic mail immediately.

Monday, February 1, 2010

FW: NSHHRA Update re Nebraska New Hire Reporting Act - please send to the membership.

Nebraska New Reporting Requirements Now Include Independent Contractors

Effective January 1, 2010, the definition of "employee" under the
Nebraska New Hire Reporting Act, for the first time, expressly included
"independent contractors." Nebraska law requires all employers to report
any newly hired or rehired employees, including, their name, address,
social security number, and the date of hire or rehire, within 20 days
of the date of hire or rehire. Nebraska employers should now perform
new hire reporting when hiring independent contractors. This is
required regardless of how little money is involved because there is no
de minimis standard like the $600 threshold for 1099-MISC. Also,
independent contractors who are paid after January 1, 2010 need to be
reported, regardless of how long the employer has done business with the
contractor in the past.

For reasons unknown the Nebraska amendment adding "independent
contractor" to the definition of "employee" did not include a definition
of the term "independent contractor." Other states have expressly
adopted such a definition, and the Nebraska's website
(www.nenewhire.com/) describes an independent contractor using the
definition used by other states as "an individual who provides goods or
services to an employer under terms specified in a contract or within a
verbal agreement for compensation that is reported as income other than
wages and who is an individual, the sole shareholder of a corporation,
or the sole member of a limited liability company." However, Nebraska
did not adopt that language in its statute, and there are no current
regulations addressing this oversight. Therefore, the language of the
law requires broad reporting, and employers must report hiring or
rehiring any contractor providing goods or services for compensation,
with nothing in law expressly limiting that to individuals, sole
proprietors, or single member corporations or LLCs.

Submitting a copy of an employee's W-4 form, with a notation of the date
of hire or rehire, is typically be sufficient for the requirements of
this Act. However, employers may now want to use the new federal Form
W-9 which has been revised to now require such independent contractor
service providers to list their first and last names, and FEIN or SSN.
Importantly, employers need to submit their reports using the social
security number of self-employed individuals, even if they operate with
a company having a FEIN. Therefore, while employers should ask
independent contractors to complete the new Form W-9, if the
individual's social security number is still not known after reviewing
the W-9, the employer should ask the independent contractor for it. If
refused, the employer is probably best to decline to hire the
contractor.

Employers are advised to seek advice from their attorney on how to
proceed given the myriad unanswered questions arising from this
amendment.

<http://www.knudsenlaw.com/Att_Bio_KRM.htm>
<http://www.knudsenlaw.com/>

Kevin R. McManaman

krm@knudsenlaw.com <mailto:krm@knudsenlaw.com>

Knudsen, Berkheimer, Richardson & Endacott, LLP

3800 VerMaas Place, Suite 200

www.knudsenlaw.com

Lincoln, NE 68502

402/475-7011 (office)

402/475-8912 (fax)

402/440-2982 (cell)

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

Happy New Year

In this time of resolution making, consider resolving to make sure your
legal house is in order:

1) Do you have a will? Do you need one?

2) Do you have powers of attorney that will allow another person to
manage your financial affairs if you should become incapacitated?

3) Do you have medical health care powers of attorney that spell out
what your wishes are should you be unable to express your own wishes?

4) Is your business structured appropriately?

5) Have you made provisions for caring for your children should
something happen to you?

6) Do you have more debt than you can handle?

<http://www.knudsenlaw.com/Att_Bio_JRL.htm>
<http://www.knudsenlaw.com/>

Jeanelle R. Lust

Knudsen, Berkheimer, Richardson & Endacott, LLP

3800 VerMaas Pl

Suite 200

Lincoln NE 68502

402 475 7011

402 423 4768 (H)

402 440 3731 (M)

402 475 8912 (F)

www.knudsenlaw.com

jlust@knudsenlaw.com

Managing Partner

Ms. Lust is a charter fellow in the Litigation Counsel of America
http://www.trialcounsel.org <http://www.trialcounsel.org/> and is
admitted in Colorado, Nebraska and South Dakota. Circular 230
Disclosure: Pursuant to recently-enacted U.S. Treasury Dept Regulations,
we are now required to advise you that, unless otherwise expressly
indicated, any federal tax advice contained in this communication,
including attachments and enclosures, is not intended or written to be
used, and may not be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related
penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing
or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed
herein. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message contains
information from the law firm of Knudsen, Berkheimer, Richardson &
Endacott, LLP which may be confidential or privileged. DO NOT FORWARD
THIS E-MAIL WITHOUT ASSURING PROTECTION OF PRIVILEGED MATERIAL. If you
have questions about forwarding this message, contact us first. All
clients are advised that communication by e-mail may not be secure and
may be subject to interception. This electronic message is intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are
not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If
you have received this electronic transmission in error, please delete
it from all computers and notify us by telephone (402-475-7011) or by
electronic mail immediately.

Monday, December 7, 2009

GINA in the bottle? Employers need to know about changes in the law.

Employers became subject to the provisions of the Genetic Information
Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) on November 21, 2009. Employers
need to be familiar with the basic provisions of this Act.

Under GINA employers:

* Are prohibited from requesting, requiring or otherwise acquiring
genetic information from applicants, employees and former employees;

* Are prohibited from using genetic information in making decisions
related to any terms, conditions, or privileges of employment; and

* Are prohibited from retaliating against employees for opposing or
complaining about unlawful employment practices and/or filing a claim
pursuant to GINA.

* Are required to maintain confidentiality with respect to
genetic information.

GINA defines genetic information to include information about an
individual's genetic tests, genetic tests of a family member, family
medical history, and information about "the manifestation of disease or
disorder in family members of the individual."

Employers must be able to recognize when a trigger of GINA's provisions
may have occurred. The inclusion of "family medical history" in GINA's
provisions may be a trap for the unwary. For example, if an employer
learns that a particular form of cancer runs in an employee's family,
the information may trigger GINA's protections against employment
discrimination, even though no information specifically related to the
employee has been revealed.

GINA does have provisions protecting employers if they inadvertently
obtain genetic information (e.g. the employee reveals genetic
information in casual conversation). However, if such information is
obtained, employers must keep the information strictly confidential and,
if in writing, must maintain such information in a confidential medical
file which is separate from other personnel information and which is
properly secured by restricted access.

The biggest area of concern regarding GINA will be for employers that
have been requiring post-offer medical/physical examinations. An a
employer must not obtain ANY family medical history as part of those
physical examinations even if the employer may feel that such
information is vital to evaluating the employee for duty (safety
concerns etc.).

Here is what an employer should do to make sure they are complying with
GINA:

1. Train, train, train. Train all staff about GINA's provisions.

2. Post the new "Equal Employment Opportunity is the Law" poster in all
Company facilities.
http://www.eeoc.gov/employers/upload/eeoc_self_print_poster.pdf

3. Review your Company's employee manual to make sure the policies list
genetic discrimination as a prohibited activity. Make sure the policies
also include a prohibition on retaliation for making a complaint about
genetic discrimination.

4. Review your Company's record-keeping procedures, and make sure that
all medical information is maintained in a confidential medical file
separate from personnel files and properly secured.

5. Review your Company's employment forms to ensure they do not request
genetic information. This review should include all medical leave
request forms.

6. Take steps to limit the risks of employee "self-disclosure." Inform
staff that such information is protected and not to be discussed.

7. Ensure that if your Company requires employees to have fitness for
duty exams that no genetic information - including family history -- is
requested.

8. Review your Company's wellness program to ensure that no genetic
information is being requested or revealed.

Jeanelle R. Lust

Knudsen, Berkheimer, Richardson & Endacott, LLP

3800 VerMaas Pl

Suite 200

Lincoln NE 68502

402 475 7011

402 423 4768 (H)

402 440 3731 (M)

402 475 8912 (F)

www.knudsenlaw.com

jlust@knudsenlaw.com

Managing Partner

Thursday, November 19, 2009

HIPAA Breach Notification Rule: Safe Harbor & Current Obligations

Interim HIPAA breach notification regulations from the U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services, ("HHS") became effective September 23,
2009, requiring entities to give notice to affected individuals of any
breach of unsecured, protected health information. These rules originate
with the Stimulus Bill and are part of the administration's promotion of
"electronic health records."

Safe Harbor

The new rules contain a safe-harbor. Entities that use HHS-approved
technologies and methodologies that result in the encryption and
destruction of certain health records need not comply with the
notification rules (although notification is still considered a best
practice).

Key to the safe-harbor is the fact that the rules apply only to
breaches of "unsecured" Protected Health Information ("PHI"). The term
"unsecured" refers to PHI that has not been secured through the use of
technology or methodology approved by HHS. HHS Guidance (called the
"HITECH Breach Notification Guidance") describes those approved
technologies and methodologies, making PHI "unusable, unreadable, or
indecipherable to unauthorized individuals". Electronic PHI is secured
when it has been adequately encrypted. Hard copies of PHI can only be
secured when shredded or destroyed such that they cannot be read or
reconstructed.

Current Obligations

A covered entity and a business associate must be able to identify,
record, investigate and report to an affected individual and HHS any
breach occurring after September 23, 2009. A covered entity's work
force must be trained on the new breach notification regulations.
Additionally, a covered entity must include sanctions for violating the
new breach of notification rules, and the sanction must be included in
the covered entity's policies. Therefore, covered entities should
examine their handbooks or other provisions regarding sanctions to
insure that they are broad enough to include sanctions relating to the
breach of notification rules. If not, they need to be updated.

Definition of Breach

If there is a saving grace in all of this, it is that the definition
of a "breach" has been modified as well. The regulations now provide
that a "breach" exists if there is an acquisition, access, use, or
disclosure of PHI in a manner not permitted by the Privacy Rules and
such action "compromises" the security or the privacy of the PHI. The
definition of "compromise" now includes a helpful risk analysis, and
under that analysis the PHI is compromised only if the event poses "a
significant risk of financial, reputational, or other harm to the
individual." In other words, many minor or insignificant breaches may
not pose a significant risk of such harm, and need not be reported to
the affected individual or to HHS. A breach of unsecured PHI is also not
considered to have occurred under certain exceptions:

1. If an unauthorized person to whom the unsecure PHI is disclosed would
not reasonably have been able to retain the PHI;

2. An unintentional acquisition, access, or use of unsecured PHI occurs
by an employee or individual acting under the authority of a HIPAA
covered entity or business associate, but only if (a) the acquisition,
access or use is made in good faith and within the course and scope of
employment or other professional relationship with the covered entity or
business associate and (b) such unsecured PHI is not further acquired,
accessed, used, disclosed by anyone; or

3. Where the inadvertent disclosure occurs from an individual who is
otherwise authorized access to unsecure PHI at a facility operated by a
HIPAA covered entity or business associate, to another similarly
situated individual at the same facility, but only if the unsecured PHI
is not further accessed, acquired, used or disclosed without
authorization.

HIPAA covered entities and business associates should each identify
their business associates, agents and sub-contractors and review their
agreements to include compliance with the new regulations. Handbooks
and training need to be updated as well.

Kevin McManaman

Knudsen, Berkheimer, Richardson & Endacott, LLP

3800 VerMaas Pl

Suite 200

Lincoln NE 68502

402 475 7011

402 475 8912 (F)

www.knudsenlaw.com

krm@knudsenlaw.com

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Long-Term Care Insurance Provisions in the Pension Protection Act Take Effect January 1, 2010

The Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA) was signed into law on
August 17, 2006. Included among the many provisions in the PPA is
Section 844 which, in part, encourages individuals to purchase insurance
for future long-term care needs. This Section takes effect January 1,
2010 and is effective for contracts issued after December 31, 1996.

Section 844 of the PPA addresses the treatment of long-term care
insurance riders that are added to annuity contracts or life insurance
policies. In the past, the Tax Code has prohibited combinations of
long-term care insurance policies with annuity contracts because payouts
from these policies were taxed differently under the Code. However,
beginning January 1, 2010, the PPA permits long-term care insurance
riders to be attached to annuity contracts. Once these riders are
attached, they will be treated as separate contracts which are
independent from the original annuity contracts. Accordingly, when a
rider attached to an annuity contract is a tax-qualified long-term care
rider, benefits paid out under the rider for long-term care will
generally be paid as tax-free long-term care insurance benefits, if
certain triggering events occur.

These new "combination" policies are expected to be desirable to
individuals previously concerned with the "use-it-or-lose-it" feature
which is found in most stand alone long-term care insurance policies
because the annuities included in the policies can be utilized, even if
no long-term care services are ever needed by the policyholders.

Laura Troshynski

Knudsen, Berkheimer, Richardson & Endacott, LLP

3800 VerMaas Pl

Suite 200

Lincoln NE 68502

402 475 7011

402 475 8912 (F)

www.knudsenlaw.com

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Making Sure Arbitration Agreements are Enforceable

Long term care facilities have recently begun offering residents the
option of agreeing to arbitrate disputes that arise during residency.
An arbitration agreement may benefit both facilities and residents as an
alternative to litigation, by reducing the expense, delay and emotional
stress associated with court trials. These agreements are usually
enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act.

Arbitration agreements typically are signed upon admission to the
facility, along with other agreements covering residency and care.
Often they are signed by family members or others who accompany the
resident. This may occur because of physical infirmity, mental
incapacity or other reasons.

The Nebraska Supreme Court recently held an arbitration agreement
invalid that was signed by a nursing home resident's son in Koricic v.
Beverly Enterprises. The son wasn't the resident's appointed
conservator or guardian and had no power of attorney. Even so, the
trial court had found the resident had given her son permission to sign
papers for her admission to the nursing home.

On appeal the Nebraska high court reversed, concluding the mother's
statements authorizing her son to sign papers didn't include the
arbitration agreement, because it wasn't required as a condition for her
admission. Since the son wasn't legally authorized to sign the
arbitration agreement it was not binding on his mother's estate.

Koricic demonstrates that nursing home admissions personnel have to
insure that anyone signing an arbitration agreement has legal capacity
to enter into a binding commitment for the resident.

Unless the resident is incompetent, the best practice generally calls
for the resident to personally sign the arbitration agreement and other
admissions documents.

If someone other than a resident must sign admissions documents, they
must have legal authority to sign for the resident. That generally
means the one signing must be a court-appointed conservator or guardian,
or else possess a power of attorney, signed when the resident was
competent, authorizing the signer to execute the document on the
resident's behalf.

Knudsen Law Firm can provide long term care facilities with properly
drafted arbitration agreements. Just as important, we can advise on
training admissions staff to insure a legally authorized person signs
the agreement, to make it enforceable and effective.

Knudsen, Berkheimer, Richardson & Endacott, LLP

3800 VerMaas Pl

Suite 200

Lincoln NE 68502

402 475 7011

402 423 4768 (H)

402 440 3731 (M)

402 475 8912 (F)

www.knudsenlaw.com